Purpose of the benchmark
This framework allows MaxDesign to self-assess against global AI SEO / GEO / AEO systems transparently. It does not produce a fake ranking — it produces a directional self-assessment that can be improved over time.
RESOURCE
Resource
AI SEO / GEO Global Benchmark Methodology
We built a transparent benchmark framework to evaluate AI SEO, GEO and AEO systems across fourteen categories. This page explains the methodology and how MaxDesign scores against it.
We do not state fake global rankings. Any placement estimate should be treated as directional until supported by independent rankings, case-study evidence, and public citations.
14 scoring categories
| Category | Weight | Definition |
|---|---|---|
| Technical SEO depth | 9.5% | Crawl, index, schema, performance, architecture. |
| GEO/AEO methodology | 9.5% | Clear frameworks for generative and answer engines. |
| Entity SEO maturity | 7.6% | Schema, SameAs, entity clarity, E-E-A-T. |
| Case study evidence | 9.5% | Documented, permissioned client outcomes. |
| Tool / system architecture | 9.5% | Internal tools, dashboards, pipelines. |
| Content system maturity | 7.6% | Pillar/support content, editorial process. |
| Automation layer | 7.6% | AI workflows, scheduled jobs, reporting. |
| Conversion architecture | 7.6% | Page structures, CRO, inquiry optimization. |
| International positioning | 6.7% | Multi-language, multi-region, global delivery. |
| Public authority signals | 5.7% | LinkedIn presence, citations, speaking, media. |
| Citations & third-party mentions | 4.8% | External links, directories, press. |
| Founder authority | 4.8% | Clear expert entity, bios, published thought leadership. |
| Schema & machine readability | 4.8% | JSON-LD coverage, validation. |
| AI answer visibility | 4.8% | Appearance in ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude. |
How to read this benchmark
14 categories, weighted scoring
The benchmark uses 14 categories covering technical SEO, GEO/AEO methodology, entity SEO, case-study evidence, tool architecture, content systems, automation, conversion architecture and other dimensions.
Source: Published methodology on this page.
Limitation: Category selection and weights are an internal decision; other evaluators might use a different framework.
0–10 scale per category
Each category is scored 0–10. Multiply the score by the published percentage weight and by 10, then sum all 14 contributions for a total out of 100. Leave unassessed categories blank and calculate the total only when all 14 scores are present. Weights are normalized from the original relative weights (sum 105), rounded to one decimal place, and sum to 100%. The total is a directional self-assessment, not an official ranking.
Source: Internal MaxDesign benchmark framework.
Limitation: Scores depend on subjective assessment; no independent reviewer has verified them.
No public case studies yet
Public case studies with client consent, independent citations, and guest articles or podcasts are still missing.
Source: Internal maturity self-assessment.
Limitation: Assessment is subjective and based on an internal framework, not an external reviewer.
What the benchmark currently shows
MaxDesign is assessed as an emerging AI SEO / GEO / AEO system. Any global placement should be treated as directional until confirmed by independent rankings.
Source: Synthesis of internal self-assessment.
Limitation: Without independent validation, the interpretation cannot be presented as an objective fact.
Evidence required
- Verified case studies with client consent.
- Independent rankings or third-party citations.
- Published methodology and reproducible frameworks.
- Publicly available AI search test results.
- Verified profiles and SameAs links.
Current estimate
Based on our internal benchmark framework, MaxDesign is currently assessed as an emerging system. Any global placement estimate should be treated as directional and requires independent validation before it can be presented as fact.
Monthly AI answer visibility testing
Every month we run a set of test prompts in ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Claude to track whether Miroslav Radosavljević and MaxDesign appear for relevant AI SEO, GEO, and AEO queries. Results are logged and used to iterate content, schema, and SameAs strategy.
FAQ
Most common questions
Does MaxDesign claim a specific global ranking?
No. We consider specific global ranking claims dangerous until supported by independent rankings. We use an internal benchmark framework and label estimates as directional.
How is the benchmark scored?
Score each category 0–10, multiply by its published percentage weight and by 10, then sum the 14 contributions. The total is out of 100 and remains blank until all categories are assessed.
What is still missing for MaxDesign?
Public case studies with client consent, independent citations, guest articles/podcasts, and regular AI answer visibility testing — all part of the 90-day plan.
Next steps
Related pages
Miroslav Radosavljević — AI SEO ExpertMaxDesign SEO OSMaxDesign AI SEO SystemGEO OptimizationAEO ServicesAI Search VisibilityEntity SEOMaxDesign Methodology
Explore all related pages (4)
Ready for the next step?
Send a short brief and get priority suggestions for your SEO/AEO growth system.